By Shariq Maqbool

In the heart of Kashmir, beneath the silence of its snow-capped peaks and the rhythm of its daily life, an invisible crisis is unfolding. While political tensions and climate concerns often make headlines, one slow-burning emergency rarely receives the attention it deserves: the growing addiction to tobacco, and the devastation it leaves in its wake.

Cigarette smoking has become a common sight in the Valley. It is present at tea stalls, outside colleges, on shopfronts, and even inside homes. To many, it feels like a normal part of life. But behind this social acceptance lies a trail of worsening health, financial collapse, and quiet grief.

Recent research conducted by the Policy and Research Institute shows that more than half of adult men in Kashmir smoke regularly. Among the youth, one in five has already experimented with smoking, many starting as early as their mid-teens. In interviews, young men often mention stress, boredom, and peer pressure as reasons for picking up the habit. One 18-year-old from Pulwama said, “Everyone in my mohalla smokes. You grow up seeing it, so you follow.”

But what seems like a personal choice soon becomes a public health burden. Hospitals in Srinagar, Baramulla, and Anantnag are reporting a steady rise in cases of lung cancer, chronic bronchitis, and heart disease linked directly to tobacco use. Many patients, doctors say, arrive at advanced stages when treatment options are limited and survival chances are low. Secondhand smoke is also impacting those who don’t smoke—children, elderly parents, and women sharing confined living spaces.

The problem doesn’t end at illness. Smoking is also draining household incomes across the Valley. A typical smoker spends ₹250 to ₹300 a day—roughly ₹9,000 a month. For families earning between ₹15,000 to ₹25,000 a month, this habit eats away at almost half their income. The long-term effects are even more damaging. Tobacco-related health problems often lead to medical debt, forcing families to borrow money or sell assets to pay hospital bills. One young woman from Sopore said her family sold their land to cover her father’s cancer treatment. “We lost everything,” she said. “And we still lost him.”

The reasons for smoking go beyond addiction. In a region marked by years of unrest, emotional strain, and social uncertainty, tobacco often becomes a coping mechanism. Many smokers say it helps them manage anxiety and pass the time. “It feels like control when everything else in life is unstable,” said a 28-year-old man from Anantnag. But studies consistently show that smoking actually worsens anxiety and disrupts sleep, making mental health even more fragile over time.

It is clear that this crisis cannot be solved through individual effort alone. What’s needed is a coordinated, compassionate public health response—one that addresses the emotional, social, and economic roots of tobacco addiction. Experts from the Policy and Research Institute have recommended several steps, including launching large-scale public awareness campaigns in Kashmiri and Urdu that speak directly to people’s lived realities. Personal stories from survivors, or from families who’ve suffered losses, can be far more powerful than facts alone.

The Institute also recommends offering free tobacco cessation programs in primary health centres, training frontline health workers to support people who want to quit, and restricting the sale of cigarettes—especially loose ones, which are cheap and widely available. They’ve also stressed the importance of targeting young people with education, mentorship, and alternative outlets like sports, arts, and skill training programs.

This is not about blame. It’s about protection. It’s about giving families a fighting chance—about preventing needless suffering. And above all, it’s about acknowledging that smoking in Kashmir is not just a personal vice; it is a social emergency. Left unaddressed, it will continue to claim lives, drain wallets, and rob young people of their full potential.

Tobacco smoke may be invisible, but its impact is not. We see it in hospital beds, in grieving households, in struggling students, and in dreams that end too soon. It is time to clear the air. Kashmir deserves the chance to breathe again.

Shariq Maqbool is Chief Spokesperson and Executive Member at the Policy and Research Institute. Chief Advisor Daily Asian Mail ,He writes on public health, social policy, and youth well-being in Kashmir.
Contact: [email protected]

Title: Beyond the Old Guard – Rethinking Political Engagement in Jammu & Kashmir

Published by: Policy and Research institute

 


Author: Shariq Maqbool Contributor Identity: Rashid Rahil

 


Executive Summary

Despite significant improvements in security indicators and infrastructural development post-2019, the political landscape in Jammu & Kashmir (J&K) remains fraught with legacy dysfunction and youth alienation. The traditional political establishment, widely seen as ineffective and self-serving, continues to dominate the narrative—alienating large sections of the population, particularly the youth.

This case study argues for a fundamental rethinking of the political model in J&K. It proposes a gradual but firm disengagement from legacy actors and an active cultivation of new, decentralized, and youth-led political platforms. The paper outlines an alternative roadmap for political transformation based on principles of inclusivity, legitimacy, and sustainable engagement—critical to India’s long-term strategic interest in the region.

Background and Context

The revocation of Article 370 in August 2019 marked a pivotal moment in the history of J&K. While this constitutional move aimed at deeper integration of the region with the Indian Union, its success hinges not just on administrative control but on political legitimacy.

For decades, governance in the region has been monopolized by a few dynastic political parties, often criticized for playing both sides—leveraging proximity to New Delhi while placating separatist sentiments locally. The result has been a vacuum of credible, people-centric politics. The traditional power centers have failed to address chronic issues such as unemployment, corruption, radicalization, and psychological alienation.

Meanwhile, a new generation of Kashmiris—more educated, aspirational, and politically conscious—is left without authentic representation. This demographic is increasingly critical of both the old local elite and what they perceive as the central government’s preference for continuity over reform.

Problem Statement

Despite policy shifts, the Government of India appears to be shielding legacy political players, while marginalizing emergent, reformist voices. This strategic contradiction sends conflicting signals to the youth and reform-minded civil society actors. As a result:

Political disillusionment is deepening.

Democratic participation remains low in spirit, despite formal electoral activities.

Radical and anti-mainstream ideologies find fertile ground due to the lack of credible alternatives.

Efforts toward national integration are perceived as cosmetic rather than transformative.

Strategic Risks of Status Quo

Youth Drift: A large segment of the youth population feels voiceless, increasing the risk of radicalization or complete withdrawal from democratic processes.

Narrative Capture by Adversaries: The political stagnation provides hostile external actors (e.g., Pakistan-backed propaganda) with the opportunity to exploit the sentiment of betrayal and disenfranchisement.

Development Fatigue: Without parallel political reform, infrastructural development and welfare schemes are viewed as transactional, not transformational.

Proposed Alternate Political Framework

1. Decentralized Political Empowerment

Empower local governance structures—panchayats, block development councils, and urban local bodies—with real autonomy.

Introduce direct youth participation mechanisms in decision-making and policy formulation.

2. Support New Political Platforms

Identify and encourage grassroots movements, youth-led civic bodies, and regionally rooted but nationally aligned political startups.

Ensure they are provided a level playing field—media access, security cover, and administrative cooperation.

3. Constitute a Transitional Political Council

A non-partisan, time-bound council comprising educators, civil society leaders, former bureaucrats, and youth leaders.

Mandated to draft a blueprint for democratic renewal and trust-building over a 3-5 year term.

4. Strategic Phasing Out of Legacy Actors

Politically and symbolically disengage from dynastic elites through policy signaling, not confrontation.

Redirect government support and engagement toward performance-based metrics, not legacy loyalty.

5. Create Safe Spaces for Youth Expression

Facilitate institutional mechanisms for young Kashmiris to engage with national institutions—parliamentary fellowships, cultural exchanges, and startup grants.

6. Narrative Ownership

Support alternative media channels and platforms for Kashmiris to tell their own stories—highlighting voices of hope, innovation, and reform.

Train and elevate young media professionals and digital content creators from within the region.

Conclusion and Recommendations

This is a rare strategic window to reset the political paradigm in Kashmir. The failure of traditional politics is evident, and the youth are demanding dignity, inclusion, and opportunity-not merely slogans or state-led development.

A bold, forward-looking political shift -away from legacy actors and toward a new generation of leaders, is not just desirable, but vital for national security, narrative control, and democratic stability. The cost of inaction is the slow erosion of gains made in security and development. A new political imagination is the missing link in India’s Kashmir strategy.

Policy Recommendations Snapshot

Recommendation Implementation Agency Timeline

Youth Inclusion Program Ministry of Home Affairs + MEITY Immediate (6-12 months)
Transitional Political Council NITI Aayog + MHA 12–24 months
Support to Emerging Parties ECI + Civil Society 1–3 years
Narrative Platforms PIB + I&B Ministry Ongoing
Disengagement Protocol PMO + NSA Discreet, phased

Annexure

Data on youth unemployment and political participation in J&K (2019–2024)

Survey snippets from Kashmir-based youth organizations

Comparative case studies: Northeast India, Afghanistan pre-2001 Bonn Agreement


By: Shariq Maqbool

War has long served as a strategic instrument for powerful nations to preserve dominance, protect economic interests, and expand geopolitical influence. In today’s global landscape, this reality remains painfully evident, particularly for the Global South, where the consequences of conflict are often the most severe. The current escalation between Israel and Iran has once again brought the world to the edge of a larger conflagration, threatening global peace and stability. If such hostilities remain unchecked, the possibility of a Third World War can no longer be dismissed—a war that would yield only widespread destruction and human suffering.

It is a mistake to believe that wars erupt spontaneously. More often, they are deliberately provoked. Instability serves as a convenient backdrop for certain global actors to pursue their strategic and commercial objectives. The arms industry, among the most lucrative sectors globally, thrives on the perpetuation of violence. Peace, in this equation, becomes inconvenient. The irony is unmistakable: the same countries that champion democracy and human rights are frequently the largest exporters of arms to conflict-ridden regions, enabling chaos while preaching morality.

For decades, regions such as the Middle East, Africa, and parts of Asia have borne the brunt of manufactured conflicts and proxy wars. The recent attacks by Israel on Iranian targets only add to this troubling legacy, raising the stakes and pushing the world closer to a dangerous tipping point. Iran’s vow to retaliate creates a perilous cycle, one that history has repeatedly shown leads not to resolution, but to greater devastation—until, eventually, all sides are compelled to return to the negotiating table.

Amid this growing global unrest, there is a critical lesson for India and Pakistan. These two nuclear-armed neighbors have remained trapped in a cycle of mistrust and hostility for decades, investing enormous sums in military capability while millions of their citizens continue to struggle for basic needs. Resources that could transform lives through education, healthcare, and infrastructure are instead diverted to fund an arms race driven by mutual suspicion and historical grievances.

The pressing question remains: what has any war ultimately achieved? The pattern is always the same—destruction, loss, and finally, negotiations. From Iraq and Afghanistan to Libya and Syria, the outcomes are tragically familiar. If diplomacy is the inevitable destination, why not begin the journey there, instead of after irreparable loss? India and Pakistan must not allow external influences or domestic pride to dictate an adversarial future that benefits no one.

It is time to reject the false security offered by militarization and embrace a future rooted in cooperation. Rather than importing weapons, both nations must begin importing ideas, knowledge, and innovation. Rather than constructing bunkers, they should be building schools and hospitals. War does not bring prosperity—it only deepens poverty, prolongs suffering, and stalls development. The true path to progress lies in bilateral engagement, grounded in mutual respect and regional ownership of peace initiatives.

History should remember us not as nations that succumbed to division and conflict, but as ones that had the wisdom to choose peace over provocation, diplomacy over destruction, and unity over hostility. At a time when the world teeters on the edge, let us summon the moral courage to forge a better, more hopeful future—together.

The author is the Spokesperson of the Policy and Research Institute, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir.

By Mehreeb Khan

Kashmir a land of unspeakable beauty is once again soaked in grief. The recent terrorist attack in Pahalgam, near Baisaran, has left deep wounds in the hearts of people who are tired of mourning. This wasn’t just another act of violence. It was an assault on peace, on life, and on the idea that we can ever return to normal.

Let it be clear there is no justification for killing innocents. No belief system, no political motive, no anger or ideology can ever excuse such cruelty. Those responsible must face justice not for revenge, but for the sake of every single person who still believes that life matters.

And this needs to be said, again and again extremism has no religion.
A terrorist is not a Muslim terrorist. A terrorist is not a Hindu terrorist.
A terrorist is simply someone who has abandoned humanity.
Anyone who kills in the name of God has already turned their back on everything sacred.
No religion in the world permits this. None.
Blaming a whole faith for the actions of a twisted few is not just wrong — it adds fuel to the fire we’re all trying to put out.

What hurts the most is this — it’s always the innocent who suffer.
The people of Kashmir, who just want to live quietly, end up burying their loved ones.
Muslims across India are judged and blamed, even though their hearts break the same.
And on the border, soldiers young men who’ve never met the “enemy” die fighting someone they have no reason to hate.
They don’t choose this war. It chooses them. And it takes everything.

The truth is all of this, all this blood and heartbreak is the result of political failure.
It’s what happens when those in power choose division over dialogue.
When leaders chase control instead of compassion.
If only there had been sincerity. A willingness to sit, to talk, to listen.
This could have been resolved long ago with humility, with courage, with basic human decency.
But it wasn’t. And the cost is paid in lives.

Still, we have to believe in something better.
We have to believe that peace is still possible.
We have to stop reducing people to labels :Hindu, Muslim, this side, that side.
People are more than that. We are more than that.

The people of Kashmir deserve peace.
They deserve dignity.
They deserve more than to be treated as collateral in someone else’s game.
And so do all the people across the world who are exhausted by conflict, by hate, by loss.

Let us speak up not to create more noise, but to finally be heard.
Let us raise our voices not to deepen the divide, but to heal it.
This is not a war between religions or nations.
It’s a war between hate and humanity.

And humanity must prevail.

By Rashid Rahil

The world’s rapidly shifting political situation hints at significant changes on the horizon for the subcontinent. Recent developments, such as the Russia-Ukraine and Israel-Palestine ceasefires, underscore this notion. US President Donald Trump wants to end the ongoing wars, conflicts and mutual hostility in the world. Meanwhile India is making strides in various fields and strengthening its political and economic ties with global powers. Under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, India has achieved notable successes in construction, development and foreign policy. Prime Minister Narendra Modi is currently on a visit to the United States, where he met the newly elected US President Donald Trump and the two leaders signed drafts of cooperation in various fields.


India took a significant step in bolstering its defence capabilities yesterday, Prime Minister Modi also signed a defence agreement with the US President Donald Trump. The agreement facilities the purchase of modern warships from the US, poised to substantially enhance India’s military strength and position it as a formidable competitor to China in the subcontinent.
Following the meeting, the US President praised PM Modi’s exemplary work. Under PM Modi’s leadership, India has witnessed remarkable progress across various sectors, earning global recognition in education, healthcare, medical science and technology. The Country’s efforts to uplift its impoverished populations have also yielded impressive results.
India’s strategic diplomatic efforts have paid off, yielding significant benefits as the nation strengthens its political and economic ties with key global players, including US, Russia, Britain, Japan and Arab Countries. Through collaborative initiatives in technology, education, industry and trade, India has successfully cemented these relationships, fostering a strong foundation for future growth and cooperation.
In the subcontinent, India and China have the potential to emerge as major world powers, driving global growth, prosperity and development. As neighbouring countries, they can collectively transform the subcontinent into a thriving region, providing a strong support system for surrounding nations, including Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Afghanistan, Iran and other Asian Countries. However, this vision requires Chinese leaders to adopt a selfless approach, prioritising the well-being of their people and neighbouring countries, much like Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s leadership style.

 

 

By Meerab Aijaz

 

Introduction

The National Education Policy (NEP) of India, introduced in 2020, aims to transform the country’s education system. This comprehensive policy seeks to address the challenges facing India’s education sector and provide a framework for equitable, accessible, and quality education.

Key Features of the NEP

1. Universal Access: Ensuring universal access to education from preschool to secondary level (ages 3-18).
2. Flexible Curriculum: Emphasizing foundational literacy and numeracy, with a flexible curriculum incorporating arts, crafts, and vocational training.
3. Multidisciplinary Institutions: Encouraging multidisciplinary institutions with multiple entry/exit points.
4. Credit Transfer: Allowing credit transfer and flexible course choices.
5. Research and Innovation: Fostering research, innovation, and entrepreneurship.
6. Increased Autonomy: Granting increased autonomy to institutions.
7. 5+3+3+4 Structure: Implementing a 5+3+3+4 structure: 5 years of foundational education, 3 years of preparatory, 3 years of middle, and 4 years of secondary education.

Pros of the NEP

1. Inclusive Education: Emphasis on universal access and equity.
2. Flexibility: Allows students to explore various interests.
3. Skill Development: Incorporates vocational training and entrepreneurship.
4. Autonomy: Encourages institutional innovation.
5. Research Focus: Prioritizes research and innovation.

Cons of the NEP

1. Implementation Challenges: Requires significant infrastructure and resource investments.
2. Language Barriers: May favor English-medium institutions.
3. Equity Concerns: May exacerbate existing socio-economic disparities.
4. Teacher Training: Requires substantial teacher training and capacity building.
5. Bureaucratic Hurdles: May face resistance from entrenched bureaucratic systems.

Improvement Strategies

1. Invest in Infrastructure: Develop school and higher education infrastructure.
2. Teacher Training: Provide comprehensive teacher training programs.
3. Language Support: Implement language support systems for regional languages.
4. Inclusive Funding: Ensure equitable funding for disadvantaged groups.
5. Monitoring and Evaluation: Establish robust monitoring and evaluation frameworks.
6. Stakeholder Engagement: Foster collaboration between governments, institutions, and communities.
7. Digital Education: Leverage technology for accessible and quality education.

Implementation Roadmap

1. Short-Term (2020-2025): Establish National Curriculum Framework, develop institutional autonomy guidelines, and initiate teacher training programs.
2. Mid-Term (2025-2030): Implement 5+3+3+4 structure, introduce multidisciplinary institutions, and establish National Educational Technology Forum.
3. Long-Term (2030-2040): Achieve 100% gross enrollment ratio in higher education, enhance global reputation of Indian education, and establish India as a hub for international students.

Conclusion

The National Education Policy of India has the potential to transform the country’s education landscape. While challenges exist, careful implementation, stakeholder engagement, and continuous monitoring can mitigate these concerns. By leveraging the policy’s strengths and addressing its weaknesses, India can create a world-class education system.

Recommendations

1. Engage stakeholders through workshops and consultations.
2. Develop context-specific implementation plans.
3. Allocate sufficient funds for infrastructure and teacher training.
4. Establish robust monitoring and evaluation frameworks.
5. Foster international collaborations for knowledge sharing.

By working together, India can create an inclusive, equitable, and quality education system, empowering its citizens to thrive in an increasingly complex and interconnected world.

 

 

Foreign Minister S Jaishankar has stated that India will no longer engage in uninterrupted talks with Pakistan, and instead, will carefully consider which issues to discuss with Pakistan, prioritizing the country’s interests. This statement comes after Prime Minister Narendra Modi received an invitation to attend the Shanghai Cooperation Organization summit in Pakistan.

Jaishankar noted that the abolition of Article 370 in Jammu and Kashmir marks a significant development, and India must now thoughtfully consider the nature of its relations with Pakistan. He observed that Pakistan’s foreign policy is facing challenges, leading to increased isolation from the international community.

According to Jaishankar, Pakistan’s inconsistent approach to terrorism, where incidents within its borders are condemned as terrorism, while similar incidents in other countries are justified, has contributed to its weakened foreign policy. He attributed this to mistakes made by Pakistan’s policymakers and rulers over time.

Jaishankar’s statement suggests a shift in India’s approach to its relations with Pakistan, prioritizing national interests and careful consideration of engagement.

India has consistently sought to improve relations with Pakistan and other neighboring countries through negotiations. However, these efforts have been hindered by the double standards of these countries. Amidst global and subcontinental changes, only countries with clear vision and foresight can achieve development and prosperity.

In the past, Pakistan has often linked religious narratives to violence and bloodshed, leveraging this approach to secure international aid, particularly in relation to Jammu and Kashmir and Afghanistan. However, this strategy has now led to widespread resentment towards Pakistan’s rulers and policymakers.

The special status of Jammu and Kashmir has been revoked, and the region has witnessed significant development in recent years, surpassing the progress made in the previous 75 years. Srinagar and Jammu are being transformed into smart cities, with efforts to make towns and healthful places more attractive. The region has seen a surge in tourism, with thousands visiting daily from across the country, and new national highways connecting Jammu to Ladakh.

This development has sparked desire among the people of Pakistan-occupied Kashmir and Gilgit-Baltistan to reconsider their relationship with India, which they feel has only brought poverty and hardship since partition. In this context, the foreign minister’s statement that the era of uninterrupted talks with Pakistan is over may be seen as a reflection of India’s growing strength and its desire to prioritize development and prosperity through negotiations with neighboring countries.

The new governments in Afghanistan and Bangladesh are also seeking to establish better relations with India, recognizing the benefits of cooperation in various fields. In this changing landscape, Pakistan may consider abandoning its dual policy and engaging in more constructive dialogue with India, potentially improving the lives of millions of people struggling with poverty and economic challenges.

Amidst constitutional and legal amendments, Jammu and Kashmir is witnessing historic assembly elections in three phases for the first time at the Union Territory (UT) level. Following the new delimitation, the Jammu and Kashmir Assembly’s constituency has been revised from 111 to 119 seats. Out of these, 90 seats will be contested directly by candidates, while 5 will be filled through nominations. Additionally, 24 seats have been reserved for Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir, in line with India’s stance on the region’s history and the government’s approval.

The government of India has resolved that Pakistan-occupied Kashmir is an integral part of India, to be recovered in due course. However, this is a topic for another time. Our focus is on the ongoing assembly elections, characterized by political upheaval, uncertainty, and the quest for power. As political and electoral activities gain momentum in Jammu and Kashmir, candidates from various parties are actively campaigning to secure the public’s mandate and claim the coveted seat of power.

Meanwhile, American diplomats have also made their presence felt in the region. On August 26, National Conference spokesperson Tanveer Sadiq announced on social media that a US delegation met with Vice President Omar Abdullah at his Gupkar residence. The delegation consisted of Counselor for Political Affairs Graham Meyer, First Secretary Gary Applegarth, and Political Counselor Abhiram. National Conference MP Agha Syed Ruhullah Mehdi and spokesperson Tanveer Sadiq were also in attendance. During the meeting, the delegation discussed the current political situation in Jammu and Kashmir, recent developments, and the upcoming assembly elections, as well as broader regional issues.

Following this, the People’s Conference released a statement revealing that a three-member US delegation met with their President, Sajjad Lone, on Tuesday. The delegation, comprising First Secretary Gary Applegarth and Political Counselor Abhiram Ghadyalpatil, met with Lone at his residence, discussing various issues. According to officials attached to the US delegation, these meetings with political leaders in Kashmir are part of a ‘routine outreach program’ aimed at assessing the ground situation in the former state.

The US delegation also met with former Srinagar Mayor Junaid Mattu, and although the details of their other meetings have not been publicly disclosed, it is reported that they met with various political and non-political personalities. The visit by the US embassy delegation, led by Political Affairs Minister Graham D Mayer, First Secretary Gary Applegarth, and Political Counselor Abhiram Ghadyalpatil, comes at a significant time – Jammu and Kashmir’s first assembly elections in almost a decade, and the first since the abrogation of Article 370 and the region’s division into two centrally administered parts. The diplomats’ activities during this election process have raised several questions: Are they attempting to influence the assembly elections in Kashmir? Is the US seeking to establish a presence in Kashmir? Are they laying groundwork in Jammu and Kashmir before the new government takes office? These questions demand answers.

The Election Commission of India must take strict notice of foreign diplomats’ meetings during the election process, as ensuring fair, free, and impartial assembly elections is its constitutional mandate. Such activities are not permissible during this time, and any interactions should be postponed until after the formation of the new government. This will prevent any suspicion that external influences have compromised the election’s integrity, thereby undermining the democratic system of independent India.

By Rashid Rahil
[email protected]

The Prime Minister of the country, Narendra Modi, during his visit to Poland and Ukraine, has established his influence in these countries in a better way to strengthen the foreign policy of the country. The country’s Defense Minister Rajnath Singh said that the relationship between America and India is stable and sustainable. The Defense Minister, who is on a visit to America, has said that America and India (both) will create a revolution in various fields. He said that America and India together are a strong power and these two countries together can ensure peace, development and prosperity in the world. He had talks with the Indian citizens in America and assured them that government is working hard for the development and empowerment of the people, the people of the country are proud of it and will remain. There is no doubt that the way the Modi government has strengthened the foreign policy of the country during the last ten years, it can really be called a milestone. Even in the rapidly changing situation in the subcontinent, the central government should act with great understanding and resolve and establish better relations with neighboring countries like Bangladesh, China, Afghanistan, Iran and Pakistan so that India’s dominance over these countries is maintained and stayed. The changing political situation of Bangladesh and Pakistan demands that the rulers of India want to expand their heart and play their important role as a powerful country, so that these neighboring countries are also developed like India. And gain political and economic advantage from a country with a large population. As far as the mutual trade and political relations between India and the United States are concerned, they are somewhat better, but Indian government needs to play a neutral role in the upcoming presidential elections in the United States so that whoever is elected as the new president of the United States, there should be no difficulty in establishing better relations with each other. As far as the internal conditions of the country are concerned, they also need to be seriously looked so that there is no weakness arises in country. The central government should act generously and establish good relations with the states without any political rivalry so that no trick of enemies can succeed in this country. New blocs will be formed for political and economic development and India will have to go beyond such bloc politics and establish friendly relations with all the countries of the world as set by the prime minister as the head of the G20 countries.
By
Rashid Rahil
rahilasianmail@ gmail.com

By Rashid Rahil

 

The occurrence of sudden calamities in the world is an undeniable fact. Everything that exists is bound to perish one day. However, nature has entrusted humans with the responsibility to protect it. When humans attempt to manipulate nature, natural disasters strike back.

In response, nations worldwide have formed a committee to develop a unified plan to safeguard the environment. This committee aims to prepare a collective strategy to combat natural calamities and take preventive measures in advance.

In recent times, the frequency of natural disasters has increased, resulting in the loss of human lives and property. The valley, surrounded by wind, dense forests, beautiful waterfalls, and high mountains, is no exception. While these mountains hold the earth firmly, human activities such as deforestation, construction, and mining have disrupted the natural balance.

Experts warn that the valley’s mountains contain dangerous minerals and lava, which could lead to catastrophic consequences if disturbed. The changing weather patterns, water and electricity shortages, and recent earthquakes are all indicative of the urgent need for action.

It is the moral responsibility of the administration to mobilize resources and take early measures to mitigate the impact of sudden calamities. The public also has a crucial role to play in protecting natural resources, planting trees, conserving water, and reducing pollution. Only through collective efforts can we safeguard this paradise-like valley and the world from natural disasters.